ELLA English (Through) Language Learning Activities

Mohammed BELLAL


“ELLA” stands for “English (Through) Language Learning Activities”.  It proposes a different way to teaching English as a second foreign language (FL2)    in technology classes at University level, in Algeria. The programs of English, as a unit of study, in most of Algerian engineering schools and University institutes of science and technologies, are heterogeneous. They are, in most cases, let to teachers to design a curriculum according to the needs of the study matter. These programs often contain some grammar reviews and text translation to meet terminology needs. Therefore, Algerian students have, in this case, very few opportunities to practise English language outside the academic context. Our article aims at proposing an appropriate strategy and context for language acquisition based on efficient and working learning theories. The main goal is to give students opportunities to practise English better, thanks to both the instructional approaches, dedicated to Language learning and the Information and Communication Technologies tools. 

Texte intégral :



Mc Carthy, C.P., (1999). Reading Theory as a Microcosm of the Four Skills. The Internet TESL Journal. V (5), 8.

Krashen, Stephen D., (1988). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Prentice-Hall International, 1988. www.sk.com.br/sk-krash-english.html Last retrieved September 2015

Colaric, S., Jonassen, D.H., (2001). Information Equals Knowledge; Searching Equals Learning; and Hyperlinking is Good Instruction; and Other Myths about Learning from the Internet. Computers in Schools, 17(3/4), 159 -169.

Robert. B. Kaplan, (2005:208). “The Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics”. Oxford University Press, 2005 - 641 pages

Morgan, M., (2008). ESL Students See the Point of PowerPoint. Essential Teacher: Complete Links. 5(1). Retrieved June 30, 2008 from http://www.tesol.org/s_tesol/sec_document.asp?CID=319&DID=10652.

Krauss, F., Ally, M., (2005). A study of the design and evaluation of a learning object and implications for content development. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, (1, 1-22).

Gregory, M., (2001). Constructivism, Standards, and the Classroom Community of Inquiry Educational Theory, 52(4), 379-408.

Jowallah. R., (2008). Using Technology supported learning to develop active learning in higher education: a case study. In US-China Education. Review. Vol5. N°12. Serial N°49. December 2008.

Hadjerrouit, S., (2007). Applying a System Development Approach to Translate Educational Requirements into E-Learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects. Volume 3, pp. 111.

Bailly. D., (1997). Didactique de l’Anglais. Tome I, pp33 « Objectifs et contenus de l’enseignement », Nathan Pédagogie. Paris 1997.

Vygotsky, L. S., (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp86.

Chapelle, C.A., Jamieson, J., (2008). Tips For Teaching with CALL: Practical Approaches to Computer- Assisted Language Learning. ISBN 01322404281, 240 pages, Pearson& Longman editors, NY, USA.

Musumeci. D., The role of grammar in communicative language teaching: An historical perspective. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Retrieved from:

http://www.mhhe.com/socscience/foreignlang/conf/grammar.html 06.08.2011.

Doughty, C.J., Long, M.H., (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning and Technology V (7). N° 3. pp. 50-80.

Jeon, I.J., Hahn, J.W., (2006). Exploring EFL teacher’s perceptions of Task-based language teaching: a case study of Korean secondary school classroom practice. Linguistics Journal, 8 (1).

Swain, M., (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In « For H. G. Widdowson: Principles and practice in the study of language ». Eds. G. Cook and B. Seidlehofer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Woozley, Ian. Second Language Acquisition and the Communicative Approach.

Last retrieved June 2010, from:


Richards, J.C., Rodgers, T.S., (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge Language Teaching Library.

Hymes, D. H., (1971). On communicative competence. In Acar, Ahmet. « The Communicative Competence Controversy». Last Retrieved January 2015 from:


Wesche & Skehan., (2002). Principles of Communicative Language Teaching and Task-Based Instruction. Last retrieved January 2015, from:


Ellis, R., (2000). Task-Based Research and Language Pedagogy, Language Teaching Research. Language Teaching Research. p. 199. July 2000 4:193-220.


  • Il n'y a présentement aucun renvoi.

Creative Commons License
Cette oeuvre est protégée sous licence CC Attribution-Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale-Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 Licence Internationale.