Les sociolinguistes face au standard linguistique et à la norme écrite en berbère

Résumé

Agzul

Nextar ad nesleḍ inaw aflutlay n yimusnawen n tesnalsit n tmetti, I waken ad nẓer d acu I d tamuɣli- nsen, amek ara tili tutlayt tamezdayt di tmaziɣt akked tagnut n tira.  Azal n usentel –agi yella-d imi atas   n ubeddel I -d yeḍran di tsertit tasnalsit (aẓayeṛ, amud).Tamukris nneɣ d tagi : D acu I d tulmisin n tutlayt tamezdayt ɣer yimusnawen n tesnalsit(ismazaɣen)? D acuten i yisekkilen akked   tiriɣtan ixtaren i tira n tutlayt tamezdayt? Amek i- d bnan ismazaɣen tamuɣli-nsen? Ɣef wacu I reṣṣan iskukal-nsen?

Abstarct

We chose to study the position of socilinguists in relation to the written standard language in Berber standard, because today the Amazigh language, whose use was reserved for daily communication, appropriates other areas such the audio-visual fields, teaching, scientific and political discourse, etc. Given the variation that characterizes and technological advances which it faces, the choice of a standard could serve as a lingua is required. Standardization is therefore urgent that "any language promotion begins with the promotion of a linguistic standard" (Sauzet; 2002). Therefore, it should ask the following question: What (s) standard (s) language (s), graphic (s) and spelling (s) advocate for linguists Berber? What types of arguments they are using to justify their choice?

Key concepts: Language planning, épilinguistique speech, coding language, linguistic norm, standardization